National
Smriti Paudel’s stalking case and its implications explained in six points
Advocates note that law enforcement frequently dismisses stalking cases, particularly when there is no physical assault
Post Report
1. Incident and allegations: Smriti Paudel, a bachelor’s student at Amrit Science College in Lainchaur, publicly accused Sumit Bhattarai of stalking and harassing her for over a year. Her Instagram post detailed relentless physical and cyber harassment, including being followed in microbuses, approached at her exam centre, threatened at college, and called repeatedly from multiple numbers. She also accused Bhattarai of bringing accomplices to intimidate her friends.
2. Viral response and public attention: Paudel’s 11-page post went viral within hours, attracting over 10,000 likes, 800 comments, and 13,000 shares. Support poured in from other women recounting similar experiences and highlighting how stalking is normalised in Nepali society. The post sparked a wider public debate on stalking, consent, and women’s safety.
3. Police inaction and systemic negligence: Despite repeated complaints filed at multiple police stations, responses were minimal. Police often pushed for “agreements” or reconciliation rather than pursuing legal action, leaving Paudel vulnerable. Advocates note that law enforcement frequently dismisses stalking cases, particularly when there is no physical assault, and often engages in victim-blaming.
4. Arrest and continuing safety concerns: Following public pressure, Bhattarai was taken into custody. However, Paudel and her supporters remain apprehensive, fearing further harassment once he is released. Past incidents, including threats and attempts to intimidate her friends, highlight the ongoing risk to her safety.
5. Broader social and psychological impact: Paudel’s case resonated with many women who have faced similar harassment. Experts say stalking causes trauma, anxiety, PTSD, and trust issues, even without physical assault. Women often internalise blame due to societal norms that excuse stalking as “true love.” The story reflects deep-rooted issues with gender norms, consent, and entitlement in Nepal.
6. Legal and policy gaps: Nepal currently lacks specific laws addressing stalking and cyberstalking. While some acts may fall under sexual harassment or misconduct provisions, victims bear the burden of evidence collection and legal pursuit. Experts and activists call for explicit legislation defining stalking, clearer legal pathways for victims, and sensitisation of police to ensure survivor-centric investigations.
(Based on original reporting by Aarati Ray)